Regenerative Thermal Oxidizer (RTO) Design Software
Analysis software to determine thermal efficiency, burner firing rate, and pressure drop for new or existing RTOs to evaluate the impacts of airflow, bed depth, cycle time, bypassing, and media characteristics.
The Klobucar regenerative thermal oxidizer (RTO) design software is available for predicting thermal and pressure drop performance of regenerative heat transfer systems. The RTO software works by breaking the heat transfer regenerators or beds down into discrete elements and then solving the heat transfer equations between the solid regenerator and flowing gas for discrete time intervals. The model repeats the calculations for the complete regeneration cycle including the regenerators switching role from heat absorption to heat release. The model repeats the regeneration cycle until the results converge to a steady state value. The model then calculates thermal and pressure drop results.
The results include thermal efficiency which is calculated based on the output temperature profiles. Burner firing rate is also calculated based on the thermal input needs to maintain the combustion chamber temperature. The software provides temperature profiles at the RTO combustion chamber and RTO outlet for each time increment of the full regeneration cycle. The software also provides temperature profiles through the height of the bed. The temperature profiles in the bed include minimum, maximum, and average values at each discrete point in the bed height. The model calculates the pressure drop based on hydraulic resistance calculated at the bed temperatures predicted by the thermal modeling.
The heat release from exothermic combustion of incoming pollutants or gas injection are included in this calculation. The effects of burner stoichiometry are included. The temperature output profiles can be used to predict thermal cleaning or bake-out of the cold face of the regenerator beds. Variations in burner control algorithm such as constant temperature or constant burner heat input can be accommodated.
The model uses a one dimensional discretization of the regenerator beds with each bed divided into elements in the height direction. The flow is assumed to be equally distributed across the face area of the regenerator and that wall heat losses are negligible. Flow maldistribution can be accounted for using empirical corrections. The model performs the complete cyclic calculation for each specific design case so it can accurately calculate the effects of unit design, unit operation, and packing parameters.
Typical Results
Inputs
Unit Design Parameters
Regenerator Face Area
Regenerator Height
Air to Fuel Ratio
Unit Operating Parameters
Inlet Flow
Inlet Temperature
Cycle Time
Chamber Setpoint
Fuel Heating Value
Pollutant Oxidation Heat Content
Bypass Percentage (Hot or Cold Side)
Packing Properties
Passage Width
Wall Thickness
Layer Height
Material Specific Gravity
Heat Capacity
Surface Area
Open Area
Bulk Density
Outputs
burner heat input – average and peak
combustion chamber temperature
outlet temperature
burner temperature rise
thermal efficiency
bed average temperatures
bed Reynolds number
pressure drop